CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897 — Page 336

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

332

to the Foreign Minister to obtain the arrest of

the offender. It being Saturday evening, and

Count Okuma being absent, I addressed a private

note to Mr. Komura in which I asked His Excellency

to be good enough to lend me his assistance in the

matter, pending the despatch of an Official Note,

and on the 31st ultimo I addressed to Count Okuma

the Note, copy of which is herewith enclosed, to-

gether with translation of the reply which I received

the following day. In this Note, Count Okuma

refers to the last occasion on which a similar

request to the present one was made by Sir E. Satow,

and reminds me that his predecessor then expressly

stated that the Japanese Government did not wish

that the fact of Sir Ernest Satow's desire being on

that occasion granted should form a precedent and

that consequently His Excellency was unable to com-

ply with my request. The Note referred to was

transmitted to Your Lordship by Sir Ernest Satow in

his despatch Treaty No.18 of December 5th 1895.

On the same day, in the absence of Count Okuma,

I saw Mr. Komura, the Vice Minister, and expressed to

him my regret that the Japanese Government had not

seen their way to complying with my request. Mr.

Komura replied that ever since Count Okuma had taken

office he had held a strong conviction that, in the

absence of a distinct understanding, it was most

undesirable to surrender fugitive offenders in Japan,

that now that Formosa was in the possession of Japan

it would be very easy for offenders to escape to

Hongkong and the Japanese Government had no guarantee

that the Hongkong Government would deliver them over.

Since his return to Tokio, I have seen Count

Okuma who repeated what Mr. Komura had said adding

that in these days of constitutional government he

would be unable to defend himself before the Chamber

were he to surrender a fugitive offender, that he

thought the time had come for negotiating an extra-

dition treaty and he could not see that the existence

of Consular jurisdiction in any way presented obsta-

On

cles

Edit History

2026-05-30 09:04:08 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
332 to the Foreign Minister to obtain the arrest of the offender. It being Saturday evening, and Count Okuma being absent, I addressed a private note to Mr. Komura in which I asked His Excellency to be good enough to lend me his assistance in the matter, pending the despatch of an Official Note, and on the 31st ultimo I addressed to Count Okuma the Note, copy of which is herewith enclosed, to- gether with translation of the reply which I received the following day. In this Note, Count Okuma refers to the last occasion on which a similar request to the present one was made by Sir E. Satow, and reminds me that his predecessor then expressly stated that the Japanese Government did not wish that the fact of Sir Ernest Satow's desire being on that occasion granted should form a precedent and that consequently His Excellency was unable to com- ply with my request. The Note referred to was transmitted to Your Lordship by Sir Ernest Satow in his despatch Treaty No.18 of December 5th 1895. On the same day, in the absence of Count Okuma, I saw Mr. Komura, the Vice Minister, and expressed to him my regret that the Japanese Government had not seen their way to complying with my request. Mr. Komura replied that ever since Count Okuma had taken office he had held a strong conviction that, in the absence of a distinct understanding, it was most undesirable to surrender fugitive offenders in Japan, that now that Formosa was in the possession of Japan it would be very easy for offenders to escape to Hongkong and the Japanese Government had no guarantee that the Hongkong Government would deliver them over. Since his return to Tokio, I have seen Count Okuma who repeated what Mr. Komura had said adding that in these days of constitutional government he would be unable to defend himself before the Chamber were he to surrender a fugitive offender, that he thought the time had come for negotiating an extra- dition treaty and he could not see that the existence of Consular jurisdiction in any way presented obsta- On cles
Baseline (Original)
332 to the Foreign Minister to obtain the arrest of the offender. It being Saturday evening, and Count Okuma being absent, I addressed a private note to Mr. Komura in which I asked His Excellency to be good enough to lend me his assistance in the matter, pending the despatch of an Official Note, and on the 31st ultimo I addressed to Count Okuma the Note, copy of which is herewith enclosed, to- gether with translation of the reply which I received the following day. In this Note, Count Okuma refers to the last occasion on which a similar request to the present one was made by Sir E. Satow, and reminds me that his predecessor then expressly stated that the Japanese Government did not wish that the fact of Sir Ernest Satow's desire being on that occasion granted should form a precedent and that consequently His Excellency was unable to com- ply with my request. The Note referred to was transmitted to Your Lordship by Sir Ernest Satow in his despatch Treaty No.18 of December 5th 1895. On the same day, in the absence of Count Okuma, I saw Mr Komura, the Vice Minister, and expressed to him my regret that the Japanese Government had not seen their way to complying with my request. Mr. Komura replied that ever since Count Okuma had taken office he had held a strong conviction that, in the absence of a distinct understanding, it was most undesirable to surrender fugitive offenders in Japan, that now that Formosa was in the possession of Japan it would be very easy for offenders to escape to Hongkong and the Japanese Government had no guarantee that the Hongkong Government would deliver them over. Since his return to Tokio, I have seen Count Okuma who repeated what Mr. Komura had said adding that in these days of constitutional government he would be unable to defend himself before the Chamber were he to surrender a fugitive offender, that he thought the time had come for negotiating an extra- dition treaty and he could not see that the existence of Consular jurisdiction in any way presented obsta- On cles
2026-05-30 09:04:08 · Baseline
View content

332

to the Foreign Minister to obtain the arrest of

the offender. It being Saturday evening, and

Count Okuma being absent, I addressed a private

note to Mr. Komura in which I asked His Excellency

to be good enough to lend me his assistance in the

matter, pending the despatch of an Official Note,

and on the 31st ultimo I addressed to Count Okuma

the Note, copy of which is herewith enclosed, to-

gether with translation of the reply which I received

the following day. In this Note, Count Okuma

refers to the last occasion on which a similar

request to the present one was made by Sir E. Satow,

and reminds me that his predecessor then expressly

stated that the Japanese Government did not wish

that the fact of Sir Ernest Satow's desire being on

that occasion granted should form a precedent and

that consequently His Excellency was unable to com-

ply with my request. The Note referred to was

transmitted to Your Lordship by Sir Ernest Satow in

his despatch Treaty No.18 of December 5th 1895.

On the same day, in the absence of Count Okuma,

I saw Mr Komura, the Vice Minister, and expressed to

him my regret that the Japanese Government had not

seen their way to complying with my request. Mr.

Komura replied that ever since Count Okuma had taken

office he had held a strong conviction that, in the

absence of a distinct understanding, it was most

undesirable to surrender fugitive offenders in Japan,

that now that Formosa was in the possession of Japan

it would be very easy for offenders to escape to

Hongkong and the Japanese Government had no guarantee

that the Hongkong Government would deliver them over.

Since his return to Tokio, I have seen Count

Okuma who repeated what Mr. Komura had said adding

that in these days of constitutional government he

would be unable to defend himself before the Chamber

were he to surrender a fugitive offender, that he

thought the time had come for negotiating an extra-

dition treaty and he could not see that the existence

of Consular jurisdiction in any way presented obsta-

On

cles

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.